Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Firm considers licensing method to transform gas into plastic products[2016/11/03]
-
Tesla doubles power in commercial Powerpack battery[2016/10/31]
-
Plastic least expensive material to replace damaged tub surround[2016/11/07]
-
California lawmakers and environmentalists battle plastic bag industry over ban[2016/09/28]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]