Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
With the coming of the new energy automobile, what is the future of traditional energy vehicles?[2018/03/09]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Tesla doubles power in commercial Powerpack battery[2016/10/31]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]