Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
29
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Global Connector Industry[2016/10/29]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
How Gaza’s plastic factories are betting on recycling[2016/11/03]
-
Bastrop deputies seeking vehicle after woman’s killing[2016/11/05]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]