Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
29
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
2016years Reach Test Report[2016/09/11]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Plastic ban in voters' hands[2016/10/24]
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]